Lang 2044 Portfolio Task 3 Paragraph and Critical Response to Press Article Instruction SheetThis task is based on Week 2, 4, 5, 6 and 9 class discussions aboutreading and reviewing press articles, types of evidence, explaining key concepts andtheory in economics applied to real-world problems, paragraph writing and referencing.This is the third

Lang 2044 Portfolio Task 3: Paragraph and Critical Response to Press Article Instruction Sheet
This task is based on Week 2, 4, 5, 6 and 9 class discussions about:
reading and reviewing press articles, types of evidence, explaining key concepts and
theory in economics applied to real-world problems, paragraph writing and referencing.
This is the third of three tasks in the Portfolio and it requires you to read and analyse a
press article and then write three paragraph answers. Paragraph 1 is separate from
Paragraphs 2 and 3, which are linked. These paragraphs together contribute a third of your
total Portfolio mark. Both Portfolio Tasks 2 and 3 will help you to succeed in your essay
(Project Task 1).
The combined length of the three paragraphs in this task should be about 800 words.
You should use one reputable external source (in addition to the article provided) to
support your answer in Paragraph C.
Administrative instructions
Please create a new file for this task.
Make sure that you include your name and student ID on the top of the page.
Then give the task the title, and label every sub-section as follows:
LANG 2044: Portfolio Task 3
• Paragraph A
• Paragraph B & C: critical response
Then, edit your writing. Submit your task online.
NOTE: It will automatically go through turnitin – which is a program that checks your writing
to see how similar it is to the writing of any other person (student).
Assessment Criteria
Paragraph structure 33
Grammar, spelling, editing
(including use of cohesive
devices) 33
Content logical and
appropriate to question 33
B & C
Paragraph structure 20
Grammar, spelling, editing
(including use of cohesive
devices) 20
Content logical and
appropriate to question 20
Appropriate structure of a
critical response 10
Language features
appropriate to a critical
response 10
Referencing 20
Read the enclosed press article ‘Technology has created more jobs than it has destroyed,
says 140 years of data’. All the paragraphs you write for this task are related to this
Portfolio Task 3 Paragraph A
The article asserts that a study by Deloitte claims that technology is a “job creating
machine”. Write a grammatically correct, logical paragraph in which you identify and
describe some of the most important reasons for these claims. You may write this
paragraph in either the first or the third person, but you must use academic language in
your paragraph. Make use of appropriate economic terms and provide relevant examples to
support your answer.
Portfolio Task 3 Paragraph B and C: critical response
Write two paragraphs in which you write a critical response to the article.
Remember that this requires that you describe, evaluate and analyse this article based on
evidence (including a reputable external source of your own).
First, write a paragraph (Paragraph B) in which you orientate the reader to the topic and
then describe and summarise the key points in the text, in a logical, grammatically correct
and well-structured paragraph. Make sure you reference the source you are summarising
correctly. (As a general rule, remember that a good summary should be about a third as
long as the original source. Include the following techniques for effective summarising:
substituting synonyms; changing word form and changing word order).
Second, you should write a paragraph (Paragraph C) evaluating the press article. In your
evaluation try to include a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence used
in the article to support its claims. (You will also need to compare the evidence given in the
text to evidence on the topic that you find in a reputable external source of your own).
Technology has created more jobs than it
has destroyed, says 140 years of data
Study of census results in England and Wales since 1871 finds rise of
machines has been a job creator rather than making working humans
Katie Allen
Tue 18 Aug 2015 16.00 AESTLast modified on Wed 29 Nov 2017 23.48 AEDT
? Are machines taking over the jobs market? A new study suggests not. Photograph:
In the 1800s it was the Luddites smashing weaving machines. These days retail staff
worry about automatic checkouts. Sooner or later taxi drivers will be fretting over selfdriving
The battle between man and machines goes back centuries. Are they taking our jobs? Or
are they merely easing our workload?
A study by economists at the consultancy Deloitte seeks to shed new light on the
relationship between jobs and the rise of technology by trawling through census data for
England and Wales going back to 1871.
Their conclusion is unremittingly cheerful: rather than destroying jobs, technology has
been a “great job-creating machine”. Findings by Deloitte such as a fourfold rise in bar
staff since the 1950s or a surge in the number of hairdressers this century suggest to the
authors that technology has increased spending power, therefore creating new demand
and new jobs.
Their study, shortlisted for the Society of Business Economists’ Rybczynski prize, argues
that the debate has been skewed towards the job-destroying effects of technological
change, which are more easily observed than its creative aspects.
Going back over past jobs figures paints a more balanced picture, say authors Ian
Stewart, Debapratim De and Alex Cole.
“The dominant trend is of contracting employment in agriculture and manufacturing
being more than offset by rapid growth in the caring, creative, technology and business
services sectors,” they write.
“Machines will take on more repetitive and laborious tasks, but seem no closer to
eliminating the need for human labour than at any time in the last 150 years.”
Here are the study’s main findings:
Hard, dangerous and dull jobs have declined
Technology substitutes muscle power. Illustration: Author’s own calculations, using
census data
Photograph: Alamy
In some sectors, technology has quite clearly cost jobs, but Stewart and his colleagues
question whether they are really jobs we would want to hold on to. Technology directly
substitutes human muscle power and, in so doing, raises productivity and shrinks
“In the UK the first sector to feel this effect on any scale was agriculture,” says the study.
In 1871, 6.6% of the workforce of England and Wales were classified as agricultural
labourers. Today that has fallen to 0.2%, a 95% decline in numbers.
An end to the drudgery of hand washing. Photograph: England and Wales Census
records, authors’ calculations
The census data also provide an insight into the impact on jobs in a once-large, but now
almost forgotten, sector. In 1901, in a population in England and Wales of 32.5 million,
200,000 people were engaged in washing clothes. By 2011, with a population of 56.1
million just 35,000 people worked in the sector.
“A collision of technologies, indoor plumbing, electricity and the affordable automatic
washing machine have all but put paid to large laundries and the drudgery of handwashing,”
says the report.
‘Caring’ jobs have risen
‘Caring professions’ such as healthcare make up a bigger proportion of the workforce.
Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images
The report cites a “profound shift”, with labour switching from its historic role, as a
source of raw power, to the care, education and provision of services to others.
It found a 909% rise in nursing auxiliaries and assistants over the last two decades.
Analysis of the UK Labour Force Survey from the Office for National Statistics suggest
the number of these workers soared from 29,743 to 300,201 between 1992 and 2014.
In the same period there was also a
? 580% increase in teaching and educational support assistants
? 183% increase in welfare, housing, youth and community workers
? 168% increase in care workers and home carers
On the other hand, there was a
? 79% drop in weavers and knitters from 24,009 to 4,961
? 57% drop in typists
? 50% drop in company secretaries
Technology has boosted jobs in knowledgeintensive
A 20-fold rise in accountants. Photograph: England and Wales Census records,
authors’ calculations
Photograph: Info/Getty Images
In some sectors – including medicine, education and professional services – technology
has raised productivity and employment has risen at the same time, says the report.
“Easy access to information and the accelerating pace of communication have
revolutionised most knowledge-based industries,” say the authors. At the same time,
rising incomes have raised demand for professional services.
For example, the 1871 census records that there were 9,832 accountants in England and
Wales and that has risen twentyfold in the last 140 years to 215,678.
Technology has shifted consumption to more
Photograph: England and Wales Census records, authors’ calculations
Photograph: David Vintiner/zefa/Corbis
Technological progress has cut the prices of essentials, such as food, and the price of
bigger household items such as TVs and kitchen appliances. The real price of cars in the
UK has halved in the last 25 years, notes Stewart.
That leaves more money to spend on leisure, and creates new demand and new jobs,
perhaps explaining the big rise in bar staff, he adds.
“Despite the decline in the traditional pub, census data shows that the number of people
employed in bars rose fourfold between 1951 and 2011,” the report says.
… and left more money for grooming
‘Rising incomes have enabled consumers to spend more on personal services, such as
grooming,’ says the report. Photograph: England and Wales Census records, authors’
Photograph: Alamy
Concluding that “the stock of work in the economy is not fixed”, the report cites the
surge in hairdressers as evidence that where one avenue closes in the jobs market,
others open.
The Deloitte economists believe that rising incomes have allowed consumers to spend
more on personal services, such as grooming. That in turn has driven employment of
So while in 1871, there was one hairdresser or barber for every 1,793 citizens of England
and Wales; today there is one for every 287 people.

Posted in Uncategorized