In the context of construction and/or property disputes, critically evaluate and compare the characteristics (both advantages and disadvantages) of TWO of the following alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods 1. Arbitration 2. Construction Adjudication 3. Independent Expert Determination 4. Mediation.

Description

In the context of construction and/or property disputes, critically evaluate and compare the characteristics (both advantages and disadvantages) of TWO of the following alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods:

1. Arbitration

2. Construction Adjudication

3. Independent Expert Determination

4. Mediation

The discussion should have consideration for:

• The types (examples) of construction and/or property disputes of that the methods may be appropriate (and possibly inappropriate) for;

• Any statute, regulations or professional guidance that are relevant to the chosen methods;

• The discussion should concentrate on critical aspects rather than mere description. It should be fully substantiated by professional and academic sources and case law.

The post In the context of construction and/or property disputes, critically evaluate and compare the characteristics (both advantages and disadvantages) of TWO of the following alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods: 1. Arbitration 2. Construction Adjudication 3. Independent Expert Determination 4. Mediation. appeared first on Essay Quoll.

Posted in Uncategorized